Waaaay back before I started The Blog, I needed another outlet for my creativity. So, I did a series of pictures of…well, I don’t even know what to say they’re of. Just pictures that tell a little story.
I’ve talked about a few of them in the past. Here’s my second favorite picture. I took it after I’d read yet another debate over creationism vs. evolution on a classical education forum.
I’ll explain it underneath for those of you who don’t commonly lurk on classical education forums or haven’t heard of the infinite monkey theorem.
Dr. Thomas Huxley stared back at the monkeys in stark disbelief. “An infinite number of monkeys, and not a single one of you majored in 16th century English Literature?! This’ll take longer than I thought…”
The theorem of the infinite monkeys states that an infinite number of monkeys, given an infinite amount of time, could randomly hit keys on a typewriter and end up typing out the entire works of Shakespeare. The theorem is attributed to a pro-evolution contemporary of Charles Darwin, Thomas Huxley, as a way of explaining how evolution can work when given enormous amounts of time.
There’s lots of debate over whether or not Mr. Huxley ever said any such thing, or whether an evolutionist would actually use that theorem to explain evolution, but the theorem and Huxley are forever linked in Urban Legend.
So….I had the stuffed monkey just begging to be photographed, and I’d just bought the typewriter at a yard sale. It was obvious that the two should go together. I gathered all the monkeys I could find in the house and took the shot. All that remained was the caption. It took me a while of re-working the wording, but in the end, I find the caption absolutely hilarious.
At the time of the picture, Huxley hasn’t yet presented his monkey theorem to the scientific community. So, he gathers an infinite number of monkeys (which of course, can’t be done-so that amuses me right there), so test his theory.
Huxley’s secret hope is that one of the monkeys studied Shakespeare in college and will quickly prove his theory correct by typing out Shakespeare’s works from memory. But, of course, monkeys don’t go to college, and for some reason Huxley was never made aware of that fact. His baffled disbelief when he finds out that none of the monkeys studied 16th century English Literature gets me every time.
Picture the scene: Huxley is looking at the monkeys and railing at them. They know they’ve done something wrong, but they can’t quite sort out what it is, but hang their heads in shame.
And then how Huxley says at the end, “This’ll take longer than I thought…” is the best part. Maybe his original theory was that an infinite number of monkeys given a week, could randomly type out the entire work of Shakespeare. But now it has to be amended to be longer than a week…longer than a month…than a year. By the time he shares his theory, he’s had to change it to “an infinite amount of time.”
You get the sense that he’s really disappointed that it would take an infinite amount of time for those monkeys to randomly type the complete works of Shakespeare.
Picture of the Day;
You can choose whether or not you want to keep reading. This is the part where I discuss the new James Bond movie, albeit in secret code so that I don’t spoil it for you.
Mom and I went to see the James Bond movie today. Second time for me. I saw it the other day and thoroughly enjoyed the action scenes, but forgot to pay attention to the plot. It’s hard to follow the plot when there are komodo dragons distracting you. This time around I could follow the plot and catch little nuances. For example, the word association scene is much better when you know what “skyfall” means. Click here for a trailer that starts with the word association scene.
Jo-Ann (remember her from lunch on Saturday?), she thinks that the ending didn’t really go down the way that it looks like it went down. Remember how someone sort of disappeared for a while in the beginning of the movie? She thinks that perhaps someone else wanted to disappear like that at the end of the movie.
At first I didn’t agree. I thought what happened, really happened, and it happened because Ronson died of an untreated gunshot wound, so it was poetic justice.
But after the second watching today with Mom, Jo-Ann may be right. Someone said to Bond, “How about we make a run for it?” But there was no need to run anywhere. It was done. The movie was over. Make a run for what? Bond said, “I’m game if you are.” I think they understood that someone wanted to disappear and that was what they meant by “make a run for it”.
But, on the other hand, there was a tear in an eye. If someone was disappearing, there wouldn’t have been a tear. Or an exhalation. No exhalation would be needed if someone was disappearing. Oh, it’s all very confusing.
Give me your opinion. If you haven’t seen the movie (and are still reading), go see the movie and report back to me what you think happened.
Incidentally, Mom looks uncannily like Judi Dench (M).
Favorite M line: “Go ahead, eject me. See if I care.”
And I love (love, love, love!) the opening song. Here’s the song. You can see the Royal Navy’s Wildcat Helicopter in the clip and Mom. Er, I mean Judi Dench. ‘Course I’ll never be able to say “crumble” properly anymore. Crumbow.
Oh, and I think the bad guy upstaged Daniel Craig whenever they had a scene together. My opinion: Best Bond Bad Guy Yet.
So, I’m watching this scene and Darling Husband is listening in and says from the other side of the table, “She has to get a flu shot?… Oh, wait, I see. She needs a tetanus shot.”
Ok, maybe you had to be there. It was funny in person…